Rockchip RK3562J vs RK3568J: In-depth Processor Comparison
Categories

Rockchip RK3562J vs RK3568J: In-depth Processor Comparison

Compare Rockchip RK3562J and RK3568J processors for industrial IoT and edge computing. Explore differences in performance, AI, interfaces, and applications.
Aug 28th,2025 531 Views

Overview

The Rockchip RK3562J and RK3568J are two mainstream processors designed for industrial IoT and edge computing. While both target similar markets, they differ significantly in performance scalability and feature sets. RK3562J is positioned for entry-level industrial applications, whereas RK3568J is geared towards higher-performance multimedia and AI computing scenarios. This article provides a detailed analysis of their technical differences and application choices.


1. Core Architecture Differences

CPU Configuration

  • RK3562J: Standard quad-core Cortex-A53 (1.8GHz) + Cortex-M0 co-processor

  • RK3568J: Enhanced quad-core Cortex-A55 (1.8GHz) with architectural optimizations for better performance

Co-processor

  • RK3562J: Integrated 200MHz Cortex-M0

  • RK3568J: No independent co-processor, but improved real-time performance via hardware acceleration units


2. Key Performance Comparison

AI Acceleration

  • RK3562J: Built-in 1TOPS NPU (INT8/INT16)

  • RK3568J: Same NPU capability, but adds TensorFlow Lite framework support

Multimedia Processing

  • RK3562J: Supports 4K30 video encoding/decoding

  • RK3568J: Maintains 4K30 support with improved encoding efficiency

Memory Support

  • Both: LPDDR4/LPDDR4X supported

  • RK3568J: Optimized memory controller with ~12% higher bandwidth


3. Industrial Features Comparison

Interface Expansion

  • RK3562J: 2×CAN 2.0B + TSN Ethernet

  • RK3568J: Adds PCIe 2.0 interface (not PCIe 3.0)

Display Output

  • Both: HDMI 1.4

  • RK3568J: Adds DisplayPort over USB-C support


4. Typical Application Scenarios

RK3562J is better suited for:
✓ Industrial control applications with real-time requirements
✓ Single-channel video processing devices
✓ Power-sensitive applications

RK3568J is better suited for:
✓ Applications requiring external accelerator cards
✓ Projects with high interface expansion needs
✓ HMI systems with complex display requirements


5. Power and Cost Analysis

Typical Power Consumption

  • RK3562J: 2–3W (M0 core can independently enter sleep mode)

  • RK3568J: 3–4W (requires more sophisticated power management)

Cost-effectiveness

  • RK3562J: More cost-competitive in basic control scenarios

  • RK3568J: More economical when interface expansion is required


6. Selection Decision Tree

  • Need a hardware real-time core? → Yes: Choose RK3562J

  • Need PCIe expansion? → Yes: Choose RK3568J

  • Is the project budget limited? → Yes: Prefer RK3562J

Leave a message
FirstName*
LastName*
Email*
Message*
Code*
Verification Code
We use Cookie to improve your online experience. By continuing browsing this website, we assume you agree our use of Cookie.