Differences Between SMARC 2.1.1 and SMARC 2.2
Categories

Differences Between SMARC 2.1.1 and SMARC 2.2

For industrial and edge computing products, SMARC 2.2 offers greater long-term value, while SMARC 2.1.1 remains a reliable and mature choice.
Jan 14th,2026 428 Views

Introduction to the SMARC Standard

SMARC (Smart Mobility ARChitecture) is a low-power, small-form-factor Computer-on-Module (COM) standard developed by SGET (Standardization Group for Embedded Technologies). It uses an MXM 3.0 314-pin connector and primarily targets ARM and low-power x86 platforms. It is widely used in:

  • Industrial automation and edge computing
  • Transportation and rail systems
  • Medical devices
  • Smart energy
  • Smart buildings and IoT/IIoT

In the SMARC 2.x series, SMARC 2.1.1 has long been the mainstream stable version, while SMARC 2.2 (released in August 2024) represents a forward evolution with specification enhancements while maintaining full backward compatibility.


SMARC 2.1.1: The Mature and Stable Mainstream Version

SMARC 2.1.1 is a revision and refinement of earlier versions, featuring clear interface definitions and pin multiplexing rules. It supports mainstream ARM SoCs (e.g., NXP, Rockchip, TI, Qualcomm) and covers common high-speed and low-speed interfaces, including:

  • PCIe (primarily Gen3)
  • USB 2.0 / 3.0
  • HDMI / eDP / LVDS
  • I²S, I²C, SPI, UART
  • GPIO

It has been widely adopted in industrial-grade products, forming a mature ecosystem with numerous carrier board designs.


SMARC 2.2: The Future-Oriented Enhanced Version

SMARC 2.2 does not overhaul 2.1.1 but introduces optional new interfaces and documentation fixes under full backward compatibility, making it better suited for next-generation SoCs. Key enhancements include:

  • Added Support for SoundWire Audio Interface (Optional)
    • The original I²S2 audio interface can now be multiplexed with SoundWire.
    • Advantages: Lower power consumption, fewer pins, support for multi-device cascading, and better alignment with modern SoC audio subsystems.
    • Particularly valuable for smart terminals, human-machine interaction devices, and voice control systems.
  • Enhanced PCIe Capabilities (Support for PCIe Gen4 Definitions)
    • Introduces PCIe Gen4 signal definitions and design considerations at the specification level (actual support depends on the SoC).
    • Reserves space for higher bandwidth, benefiting high-speed AI acceleration, NVMe storage, and industrial cameras.
    • Additionally, adds a SERDES Reset signal as a flexible alternative to PCIe Reset, improving initialization reliability for high-speed serial links.
  • Improved Pin Definitions and Documentation Clarity
    • Corrects ambiguities and errors in earlier specifications.
    • Optimizes signal descriptions, multiplexing rules, and annotations (e.g., HDMI AC coupling details).
    • Significantly reduces design risks for carrier board developers and hardware engineers.
  • Synchronized Update to the Design Guide
    • The v2.2 Design Guide (released in 2025) provides clearer serial debugging recommendations, improved USB-C/Type-C reference designs, and more practical implementation advice.
    • While not mandatory, it greatly enhances engineering feasibility.


SMARC 2.1.1 vs. SMARC 2.2 Comparison Table

Item SMARC 2.1.1 SMARC 2.2
Standard Positioning Mature and stable Maintenance enhancement, future-oriented
Backward Compatibility ✅ Full compatibility
Audio Interface I²S I²S + SoundWire (optional multiplexing)
PCIe Capabilities Primarily Gen3 Defines Gen4 support + SERDES Reset
Pin Count Unchanged Unchanged
Documentation Clarity Good Clearer and more rigorous (bug fixes)
Design Guide v2.1.x v2.2 (updated)
Applicable SoCs Traditional ARM SoCs Next-generation ARM / AI SoCs


Engineering and Product Selection Recommendations

  • When to Choose SMARC 2.1.1:
    • Existing mature carrier board designs
    • Stable product lifecycle
    • No strong demand for PCIe Gen4 or modern audio architectures
  • When to Choose SMARC 2.2:
    • New projects or platform development
    • Using next-generation SoCs like RK3588, RK3576, or NXP i.MX9
    • Requiring higher PCIe bandwidth or SoundWire audio
    • Desiring longer technical lifecycle for the carrier board


Conclusion

SMARC 2.2 is not a rejection of 2.1.1 but a "reinforcing upgrade" oriented toward the future: it preserves the existing ecosystem while proactively adapting to new SoC capabilities and improving specification rigor and implementability. For industrial and edge computing products, SMARC 2.2 offers greater long-term value, while SMARC 2.1.1 remains a reliable and mature choice.

Leave a message
FirstName*
LastName*
Email*
Message*
Code*
Verification Code
We use Cookie to improve your online experience. By continuing browsing this website, we assume you agree our use of Cookie.